Prospective LCA assesses environmental impacts of future systems. Rather than evaluating current technologies with current background data, it models how products will perform under projected future conditions.
The approach matters because today’s background systems won’t persist. Electricity grids are decarbonising. Manufacturing processes are improving. Material recycling rates are increasing. Products designed today will operate in tomorrow’s systems.
Future-Oriented Assessment
Traditional LCA uses current data. A 2025 electricity grid mix, current steel production processes, existing transport infrastructure. This suits products with short lifespans used in stable systems.
Long-lived products face different conditions over their lifetimes. A building constructed in 2025 operates until 2075 or beyond. Its use-phase impacts depend on future energy systems, not current ones. Prospective LCA models these future states.
Emerging technologies have no current market presence. Laboratory prototypes and pilot facilities don’t represent future industrial-scale production. Prospective LCA projects how technologies will perform at commercial scale.
Scenario Development
Prospective LCA requires scenarios describing future systems. These scenarios model electricity generation mixes, industrial process efficiency, transport technologies, and material flows.
Energy scenarios project grid decarbonisation paths. Will nuclear capacity expand? Will renewable shares reach 80%? Will fossil generation persist with carbon capture? Each pathway creates different use-phase impacts for electrical products.
Technology scenarios model manufacturing improvements. Cement production might adopt carbon capture. Steel-making might shift toward hydrogen reduction. These changes affect material-related impacts.
Circular economy scenarios project recycling rates and material quality degradation. Higher recycling rates reduce virgin material demand but require more reprocessing energy. Prospective LCA models these trade-offs.
Time Horizons
Prospective studies need defined time horizons. Projections for 2030 differ from projections for 2050. Nearer-term scenarios carry less uncertainty but show less system change.
Technology development pathways matter. New technologies start expensive and inefficient, then improve through learning effects and scale economies. The learning curve shapes future performance.
Infrastructure investment creates path dependencies. Current decisions about power plants and industrial facilities determine options for decades. Prospective LCA should reflect committed developments and likely trajectories rather than unconstrained possibilities.
Data Challenges
Future data doesn’t exist by definition. Prospective LCA relies on modelling, projections, and assumptions.
Scaling relationships project how pilot technologies perform at industrial scale. Energy consumption per unit might decrease with larger equipment. Material efficiency might improve through optimised processes. These scaling effects require engineering analysis.
Learning curves model cost and efficiency improvements. Established patterns from other technologies inform projections. Solar PV costs followed predictable learning curves. Emerging technologies might follow similar patterns.
Energy system models provide grid projection data. Integrated assessment models project energy pathways under different policy scenarios. These supply background data for prospective studies.
Uncertainty Management
Future projections carry substantial uncertainty. Energy policy, technology breakthroughs, and economic conditions all affect outcomes.
Prospective LCA addresses uncertainty through multiple scenarios. Rather than one future projection, assess several plausible pathways. Results show how outcomes vary across scenarios.
Sensitivity analysis tests which assumptions matter most. If results change little between optimistic and pessimistic grid decarbonisation scenarios, electricity source matters less than other factors.
Uncertainty shouldn’t prevent prospective assessment. Decisions get made regardless. The question is whether they’re made with or without consideration of future system conditions.
Application Areas
Prospective LCA suits several contexts:
Long-lived infrastructure operates across decades. Buildings, renewable energy installations, and transport infrastructure all face changing background systems. Prospective assessment reveals how performance evolves.
Emerging technologies have no historical data. Lab-scale processes need projections to commercial scale. Early adopters face different conditions than future mass-market users.
Policy evaluation requires forward-looking analysis. Will electric vehicle mandates reduce emissions given future grid mixes? The answer depends on projected electricity sources, not current ones.
Investment decisions about new facilities consider future competitiveness. A manufacturing plant built today operates for 20-40 years. Its environmental performance depends on future energy prices, carbon policies, and market conditions.
Combining Prospective and Consequential
Prospective and consequential LCA address different aspects of change. Prospective models temporal evolution. Consequential models market responses. Both can apply simultaneously.
A consequential prospective LCA asks: what are the environmental consequences of a decision given future system conditions? This combines market substitution modelling with future background data.
An electric vehicle study might use prospective grid data (temporal change) and consequential marginal electricity sourcing (market effects). The combination provides more complete analysis than either approach alone.
Validation Challenges
You can’t validate future projections against reality until that future arrives. Prospective LCA results remain uncertain by nature.
Historical validation offers partial verification. Past prospective studies can be compared with what actually happened. These comparisons reveal which projection approaches work better.
Scenario plausibility matters more than accuracy. The goal isn’t predicting one future precisely. It’s exploring how outcomes vary across plausible futures.
Practical Implementation
Prospective LCA requires:
- Energy and technology scenarios from credible sources
- Understanding of likely technology development paths
- Multiple scenarios spanning uncertainty ranges
- Clear documentation of assumptions
- Sensitivity analysis showing which assumptions matter
Data sources include:
- International Energy Agency energy scenarios
- Integrated assessment models (IMAGE, MESSAGE, REMIND)
- National energy policy projections
- Industry technology roadmaps
- Academic research on emerging technologies
Software implementation needs custom data. Standard LCA databases represent current systems. Prospective studies require modified background databases reflecting future conditions.
When to Use Prospective LCA
Prospective assessment adds value when:
- Products have long operational lifetimes
- Background systems are changing substantially
- Technologies are emerging without established data
- Policy decisions affect long-term outcomes
- Investment decisions span decades
Prospective assessment may not suit:
- Short-lived products in stable systems
- Current performance benchmarking
- Regulatory compliance with standardised methods
- Situations where added uncertainty outweighs insights
The approach acknowledges that future systems differ from current ones. Whether this complexity improves decisions depends on your specific context.
Need LCA, EPD, or CBAM consultancy?
Or have a research proposal to collaborate on?
Global commercial consultancy • Horizon Europe, UKRI & Innovate UK research partner